Active vs passive: which is better? | The Evidence-Based Investor (2024)

Active vs passive: which is better? | The Evidence-Based Investor (1)

The “active vs. passive debate” has raged on for a long time in the field of investing. Where actively managed funds aim to outperform the market through complex strategising, passive investing is more about matching market performance through tracking a specific index. In this video, Professor CRAWFORD SPENCE looks at the difference between the two styles, and the wealth of research on their effectiveness.

TRANSCRIPT

Robin Powell: A key decision investors need to make is whether to use actively managed funds or passively managed funds. So what exactly do we mean by active funds, and how do they differ from passive? Here’s Crawford Spence, Professor of Accounting at King’s College London.

Crawford Spence: Actively managed funds try to beat the market, they try to do better than average. The language in the field is “generating alpha” – that’s what they use, the Greek letter “alpha” – to talk about generating better than average returns. So it’s all about picking winners and losers in the stock market, and betting on the winners – or the losers, if you’re going to short sell them. There’s different ways to do that: it can be through conventional stock picking, fundamental analysis, bottom-up stuff, or more quantitative investing, a bit more systematic factor-based investing – but the ethos there is really to try to do better than average, to generate an alpha.

RP: So, that’s active fund management. And, for many decades, active was by far the most popular way to invest. Let’s look now at passive investing, which – in recent years – has been gaining ground on active, and in many areas, overtaking it.

CS: Passive investing doesn’t try to be better than average. It absolutely tries to be average. So, instead of generating alpha, it does what they say: “tracks beta” is the language they use in that space. So you’ll take, say, a basket of stocks – maybe a weighted average of the FTSE100, for example, or maybe the Standard & Poors 500 – and you’ll just have a weighted portfolio in that index, and you’ll just put your money in there and basically leave it. Track the index over time, every six months or maybe a year, your portfolio will rebalance; and the idea is really to generate consistent returns over a long- term basis.

RP: So, in a nutshell, those are the differences between active and passive. The all-important question is, which one’s better?There is, in fact, a clear winner.

CS: So the academic evidence has been pretty clear on which is better – active or passive investing. And this is nothing new: we’ve known for decades now that, really, over the longer term, passive investing delivers much better returns to investors. For example, any given year, you might find half the active fund managers outperform the relevant benchmark (meaning they beat the market). However, if you fast-forward to, maybe, three, five, or ten year time horizons; the number of active fund managers who beat their benchmarks really dwindles quite rapidly – to the point where, if you look at a fifteen year time horizon, almost nobody beats the market in the active fund management space. And those people can’t really be identified ex ante. You don’t know who they’re going to be beforehand; and the other complicating factor is, you don’t know if they’ve beaten the market because of skill or because of luck. So, you’re really talking about a very narrow number of people who are very hard to identify, and you don’t know why they’ve beaten the market either.

RP: Despite the overwhelming evidence against using actively managed funds, there are still many financial advisers who recommend using them. So be sure, when choosing a financial adviser, that they’re fully aware of the academic research that Professor Spence refers to.

ALSO IN THIS SERIES

Fees and charges make a big difference

Crypto investing is more like gambling

Strong opinions can be costly

CONTENT FOR ADVICE FIRMS

These videos are examples of the high-quality financial education content produced by Regis Media. If you work for a financial advice firm and would like to learn more about the content we provide for advisers around the world, email Robin Powell, who will be happy to help you.

THE TEBI YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Have you visited The Evidence-Based Investor’s YouTube channel lately? You’ll find a wide selection of videos on there, all about investing and personal finance. Why not subscribe and be one of the first to see our latest content?

© The Evidence-Based Investor MMXXIV

© 2020 The Evidence-Based Investor. All rights reserved.

Active vs passive: which is better? | The Evidence-Based Investor (2024)

FAQs

Active vs passive: which is better? | The Evidence-Based Investor? ›

There is, in fact, a clear winner. CS: So the academic evidence has been pretty clear on which is better – active or passive investing. And this is nothing new: we've known for decades now that, really, over the longer term, passive investing delivers much better returns to investors.

Is it better to be an active or passive investor? ›

Passive investment is less expensive, less complex, and often produces superior after-tax results over medium to long time horizons when compared to actively managed portfolios.

What is passive vs active investing evidence? ›

Passive Investment Management

Research shows that in the long-run, passive investments are likely to outperform active investments due to lower costs, fewer timing errors and less likelihood of poor investment choices.

Why active funds are better than passive funds? ›

Here are some of the key differences between active and passive funds: Nature: Active funds are more dynamic and flexible, as they can adapt to changing market conditions and opportunities. Passive funds are more static and rigid, as they follow a predetermined strategy and do not deviate from the index.

Why are passive funds more popular to investors? ›

Passive Investing Advantages

Passive funds simply follow the index they use as their benchmark. Transparency: It's always clear which assets are in an index fund. Tax efficiency: Their buy-and-hold strategy doesn't typically result in a massive capital gains tax for the year.

Do active investors beat the market? ›

The average investor may not have a very good chance of beating the market. Regular investors may be able to achieve better risk-adjusted returns by focusing on losing less. Consider using low-cost platforms, creating a portfolio with a purpose, and beware of headline risk.

What are the disadvantages of active investing? ›

Disadvantages of active investing

Generally higher fees — Active management fees can run from anywhere between 0.2% and 2% of the assets under management (AUM) annually, as compared to the expense ratios seen in passive ETF investment options, which average between 0.1% and 1%.

What are the pros and cons of passive investing? ›

The Pros and Cons of Active and Passive Investments
  • Pros of Passive Investments. •Likely to perform close to index. •Generally lower fees. ...
  • Cons of Passive Investments. •Unlikely to outperform index. ...
  • Pros of Active Investments. •Opportunity to outperform index. ...
  • Cons of Active Investments. •Potential to underperform index.

Do active funds outperform index funds? ›

Index investing features lower fees, greater tax efficiency, and broad diversification. Research shows that over the long-run, passive indexing strategies tend to outperform their active counterparts.

Is active or passive investing riskier? ›

In general, a passive investment strategy tends to be less risky than an active strategy, because it doesn't attempt to time the market. What it does require from investors is patience and time.

What is the success rate of active funds? ›

Of the nearly 3,000 active funds included in our analysis, 47% survived and outperformed their average passive peer in 2023.

Why do people invest in active funds? ›

“Active” Advantages

Flexibility – because active managers, unlike passive ones, are not required to hold specific stocks or bonds. Hedging – the ability to use short sales, put options, and other strategies to insure against losses.

Do actively managed funds do better? ›

Typically, success rates for active managers are higher in equity categories focusing on mid and small-cap stocks rather than large caps. Active funds also have higher odds of success in equity categories where the average passive peer is biased to a specific economic sector or top-heavy in terms of individual names.

Why passive investing beats active investing? ›

Because active investing is generally more expensive (you need to pay research analysts and portfolio managers, as well as additional costs due to more frequent trading), many active managers fail to beat the index after accounting for expenses—consequently, passive investing has often outperformed active because of ...

What are the problems with passive investing? ›

The Danger of Passive Investing for Markets

That is, in a market downturn, there may be a rush for the exits as both passive and active investors get out of large cap stocks. This may become even more of an issue as passive funds continue to take market share from active peers.

Should investors hold a passive portfolio? ›

Investing in passive instruments, while providing broad market exposure, leaves the investor completely exposed to market risk. Successful active investment managers, through a high level of active share, have the ability to mitigate market risk.

What are the 5 advantages of passive investing? ›

Advantages of Passive Investing
  • Steady Earning. Investing in Passive Funds means you're in it for a long race. ...
  • Fewer Efforts. As one of the most known benefits of passive investing, low maintenance is something that active investing surely lacks. ...
  • Affordable. ...
  • Lower Risk. ...
  • Saving on Capital Gain Tax.
Sep 29, 2022

Is investing the best passive income? ›

Investing can be a great way to generate passive income, but only if the assets you own pay dividends or interest. Non-dividend-paying stocks or assets like cryptocurrencies may be exciting, but they won't earn you passive income.

Should I invest in passive funds? ›

Passive investing involves creating a fund portfolio that closely mirrors a market index, contrasting with active management, where a fund manager strives to outperform the market using various strategies. If you are optimistic about the markets, passive funds can give your portfolio a substantial boost.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 5695

Rating: 5 / 5 (50 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Birthday: 2000-07-07

Address: 5050 Breitenberg Knoll, New Robert, MI 45409

Phone: +2556892639372

Job: Investor Mining Engineer

Hobby: Sketching, Cosplaying, Glassblowing, Genealogy, Crocheting, Archery, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is The Hon. Margery Christiansen, I am a bright, adorable, precious, inexpensive, gorgeous, comfortable, happy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.